Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:
Human verification ... What is the name of my program? File & Image ********?:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: z_o_o_m
« on: 22-10-2015, 09:31:56 »

You should keep it uploading as it is and not hunt few second by this.
Posted by: fgdfgdfg
« on: 21-10-2015, 23:13:56 »

OK. Then what about adding a button which would (when pressed)
1) mark all ready (queued for upload) files in FUP as paused
2) increase paralel upload count +1

Then I could get a few images through.

And on the second press this button would
1) decrease paralel upload count -1
2) mark all paused files as ready (queued for upload)

It is a macro of a kind (I am doing it like this by hand which frustrates me). And I suppose it is perfectly compliant with your own logic. Or could you please offer some other kind of relief?
Posted by: z_o_o_m
« on: 19-10-2015, 07:58:09 »

My program is not supposed to work like this so I do not plan that
Posted by: fgdfgdfg
« on: 19-10-2015, 01:08:27 »

Exactly. Finishing uploads of images take only seconds. But not videos.

I have another idea! Could you give me possibility to run another instance of app via command line? I should be able to choose if I want to use existing one or start new. I think this would solve this issue too.
Posted by: z_o_o_m
« on: 18-10-2015, 19:07:12 »

Use it as it is ;)
Finishing uploads takes only few seconds.
Posted by: fgdfgdfg
« on: 18-10-2015, 18:19:35 »

It would work this way (provided that parallel upload count is 1): I would select six images to upload, start force upload and watch all of them being uploaded one by one (due to that parallel upload count is 1).
Posted by: fgdfgdfg
« on: 18-10-2015, 18:13:40 »

OK. What if this force upload function could start only as many uploads as is already running (which is limited by the parallel upload count setting)? It is still enough for a few 200 kB images to get through and it could NOT start too many uploads if there were many waiting for finishing (as you say). Thanks for consideration.
Posted by: z_o_o_m
« on: 18-10-2015, 11:09:17 »

Sorry, not really planned. It has to wait because it could start too many uploads if there were many waiting for finishing.
Posted by: fgdfgdfg
« on: 16-10-2015, 00:29:56 »

Hi,
could you add force upload function? It should be able to start uploading of selected file(s) immediately. Regardless of parallel upload count and other settings. Small picture(s) do not need to wait for big files to be uploaded!
Thanks.